|
As
citizens prepare to file tax returns for 2006, the issue of taxation becomes a
sobering reality that begs the question; how much tax is enough? It now takes
the average Georgia worker 23 weeks, working 5 days a week, 8 hours a day
to pay the current federal, state and local taxes and fees. Now officials of Douglas County Georgia want more.
On
March
20, 2007 the voters will have
the opportunity to cast one of the most important tax votes in our history. If
approved, the proposed $150,550,000, twenty year school property bond will put
Douglas County School System more than $300,000,000 in debt.
This time I will vote "NO" against more debt.
This
was not an easy decision for me to make. I have spent months researching the
call by the Board of Education for more debt. I have concluded that new bonds
will do little to solve the problems of growth or to improve the quality of education
in our county.
More
than 70 percent of our property tax goes to the school system. This makes the Board
of Education one of the most powerful government entities. Citizens who have
attended one of "their" board meetings probably found they were the only ones present.
Restrictive rules on public participation have created a board isolated from
the public and distant from the realities of citizens. Those attempting to
comment are silenced and threatened with removal. What kind of political
potentates have we elected?
The
Board of Education waited until after the November election to call for more
property tax. They knew if they placed this property tax increase on the ballot,
the bond vote would have failed and they certainly would not have been
re-elected to office.
The
devious and unprecedented ballot language panders to senior citizens. The
ballot language claims that some qualified home owners will be exempt from this
property tax increase. It is insulting that the school board believes that
because one class of home owners may be exempt, they would be willing to pass the
burden of millions of dollars of debt onto their children and grandchildren.
Given
the history of project cost overruns and mismanagement by Douglas County officials, there are no guarantees there will be
enough money to build all the promised new schools. If overruns consume all the
bond money, existing schools will get nothing. No new computers, no
renovations, no new buses. The school board will then come back and ask for
more money.
The
Board of Education will not even reveal the locations where new schools may be
needed for fear of voter backlash. Since some neighborhoods have adequate schools,
the new ones will not be built in their communities. Citizens rightly believe they
will be footing the bill for new schools for new development in other areas.
According
to school officials, there are few available properties to accommodate the new
schools. This means the school board would use eminent domain to seize
property, thereby displacing homes, businesses and communities.
An
issue of concern is the amount of money that's paid to school officials. The school
superintendent is paid more than $200,000 a year in salary and expenses. That's
half the salary of the President of the United States or about the same as the Vice President. While this
may seem nominal, given the massive expenditures of the school system, it is a
consideration for common folks who are asked to fund more debt.
While
they have trouble recruiting new teachers because starting pay is too low
compared to corporate offerings, the superintendent's salary has escalated from
$140,000 to more than $200,000 in just a few years. Most of us receive a meager
3 percent cost of living increase.
In
a recent meeting with the Douglas County state legislative delegation, rather than proposing
ideas for better education, school officials lobbied to remove limits on property
tax. School officials were more concerned about the quantity of taxes they can squeeze
out of property owners than the quality of education they should provide. They
also lobbied against a proposal that would give parents of special needs kids an
alternative to inadequate education. School officials claim only they have the
expertise to educate these children. At the same time, they complain these
children are driving down test scores.
It's
a fact that Georgia is near the bottom in education. We have moved up slightly
only because two other states have moved down. Douglas County ranks 11th in test scores out of the 13 metro Atlanta counties. We have some of the finest teachers in the
nation. It's not their fault! We must elect officials who can think out of the
box and use cost effective ways to improve education.
Little
has been done to address the problem of growth in the county, other than to ask
for more taxes. Let's look at some solutions.
- The issue of growth is in the lap of the Board of
Commissioners and the city councils. They have the authority and mandate
to reject any development that will adversely affect our communities. While
property owners have a right to develop their properties, it should not be
done at the expense of taxpayers. A moratorium on development may be
needed until the citizens and government can study better solutions to
growth.
- It must be determined
if allegations of under assessed commercial and industrial properties are
true. If so, this is costing the county tens of millions of dollars in
revenue each year. Revenue short falls must then be made up by home
owners. This may explain the over assessed values we are seeing of homes.
While the real estate market slumps and sales stagnate, property value assessments
are artificially inflated.
- We should do as many
other communities and utilize vacant "big box" facilities and convert them
into schools. This would save millions of dollars and be an alternative to
buying more mobile class rooms.
- Better education does
not always mean elaborate sports stadiums, $20 million gymnasiums and
theaters. Sports and other activities can be provided by private athletic
and arts associations. This is how private and charter schools are able to
provide cost effective and better quality education.
- On a broader scale, we
must push all elected officials to end restrictive federal, state and
regional mandates that tie the hands of parents, teachers and
administrators. This would allow parents to choose better alternatives for
educating their children.
Voting
"NO" on March 20th will send a clear message that we must seek
better long term solutions for growth and education. It will not be an easy
task, but it is an issue we must face head on. One thing is certain we must not
attempt to solve short term problems with long term debt. Future generations
will applaud our actions. After all, "it's for the children."
Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)
|