|
A Georgia Budget and Policy Institute Commentary
By Alan Essig Executive Director
For those who enjoy politics, Georgia ’s legislative session in recent weeks has provided
some of the best entertainment around – a last minute $142 million tax cut, a
veto of the supplemental budget by the Governor, some eloquent oratory in the
House of Representatives leading to an override of the veto, and lots of good
old fashioned name-calling. For those who are concerned about sound
fiscal policy, however, the events have been alarming.
Putting politics and personalities aside, the actions
of both the Legislature and the Governor over the past several months raise
serious fiscal policy questions: Will there be any surplus money to
increase the reserves and fund next year’s education enrollment growth?
Does the state have a fiscal plan? While several policy missteps led to
the current turmoil and concerns, one significant policy solution by the
Governor can bring us back to the fiscally responsible path.
The first misstep occurred when the Governor raised
the revenue estimate for the current fiscal year. The original FY 2007
budget was based on 1.8 percent growth in general revenues over the FY 2006
actual revenue collections. In January, the Governor increased the
projected FY 2007 revenue growth to 5.1 percent. Revenues have only
increased by 4.7 percent in the first nine months of the fiscal year.
While this optimistic revenue estimate could put a
strain on meeting the budget this year, it is more problematic in policy terms
because of its effects on the broader fiscal plan of the state. The
Governor’s revenue estimate must account for a planned surplus to fund school
enrollment growth in next year’s FY 2008 budget. That is, the Governor
needs to be conservative in how high he sets the revenue estimate so that there
are “extra” revenues left over to spend on next year’s enrollment growth.
The reality is that revenues actually need to grow closer to 6.1 percent in order
to fully fund the FY 2007 budget and generate a surplus to fund next year’s
school enrollment growth ($180 million).
In addition, a revenue estimate should account for
increasing the Revenue Shortfall Reserve (RSR), which is the state savings
account. The RSR needs an additional $1 billion to be fully funded.
The Governor should be setting a goal of increasing the RSR by a minimum of
$200 million a year to prepare us for the next recession. To reach such a
goal the Governor would need to set a revenue estimate that plans for a surplus
of $380 million ($180 million for the education mid-term adjustment and $200
million for reserves). The Governor’s current revenue estimate does not
account for such a planned surplus.
The Governor wasn’t alone in swerving from the path of
good policy, though. Faced with an impasse on what to fund in the
supplemental budget, the Legislature spent $142 million on a one-time property
tax cut. Again, the “extra” money was not focused on a sound fiscal plan
of increasing the reserves and funding enrollment growth. The Legislature
irresponsibly funded a tax cut for political reasons, while knowingly
under-funding next year’s education mid-term adjustment and not planning to
increase the Revenue Shortfall Reserve.
While the policy missteps were glaring, the Governor’s
veto of the supplemental budget gives the Governor and General Assembly the
opportunity to fix a fiscally unsound budget. The Governor should
establish a state fiscal plan that fully funds the education mid-term
adjustment and increases the RSR through planning for a surplus. The
Governor should lower the FY 2007 revenue estimate, which would eliminate the
revenues available for the tax cut and channel any surplus funds to reserves
and education growth. The General Assembly would then be in a position to
pass an FY 2007 Amended Budget that is both responsible and fiscally
conservative. There is still time to place sound policy over political
pandering.
Please forward this e-mail to anyone who might be
interested in receiving this or future reports. I encourage those
interested parties who are not currently receiving GBPI e-mail notifications to
sign-up at www.gbpi.org.
Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)
|